Am I the only one that changes his mind every day on this story.
One day I can't bear to think of, in essence, starving somebody to death.
The next, I can't bear to think about denying death, if that was the
woman's wish. I felt a little better when consecutive columns in our paper
by writers I respect took the exact opposite views of each other.
What does bother me is people rushing into to claim they have a monopoly
on the moral high ground on this story. Why can't people just admit that
it's a close, tough call and that reasonable people can disagree. Heck, I
disagree with myself!